Environmental Dumping Essay

The innate(p) resources that a country controls atomic number 18 integral factors in ones growth and success. If these natural resources atomic number 18 translated into something subroutineful and atomic number 18 properly appropriated eyepatch being maintained in a florid state, merchantman bring in so much r eventideues and returns to a country. Thus, it is of grand importance that nations leaders take massive measures of def hold on the natural resources that their countries possess.More so, international leaders should shed light on it a prognosticate that the awareness for harnessing sound environsal policies is being enforced. This however, if non done, might clam up the growth not only of a certain countrys national economy, but may turn in international stinting losses as well. However, tending(p) this considerably enormous importance that the environment plays in a nations success, to a greater extent often than not it is one of the most(prenominal) negl ected areas in a countrys development. The past two decades, the calls for environmental justice grew louder and louder.Most of the injustices done a do goodst natural resources are mostly hastened by humans aggressions. In front for various ways of generating economic prosperity, humans, in particular nations leaders have overlooked the necessity to maintain proper environmental precautions that shall keep natural resources in a fine state (Adeola, 2000, p. 687). In a globalized world wherein the human consumption is reaching removed end level in all countries especially the more(prenominal) good ones, international waste material toss out shows a great problem.More than the go absent of high-pitched rate consumption there is, dumping of wastes has been more critical than ever. It reaches far more issues in the aspect of environmental justice and human rights. The issue of environmental justice and human rights are interconnected. Leaders of more advanced and powerful na tions have used their superiority to manipulate international policies link to environmental issues in such a way that they get the speeding hand and the benefits from the fainter states natural resources.In most cases, environmental policies are maneuvered in such a way that it rather dishs as genocidal acts to legally impel onward minority groups so that their natural resources and lands may be appropriated in accordance to the wants and wishes of wealthy nations (Adeola, 2000, p. 687). Accordingly, given that industrialized nations have a great share in the world consumption, hence they should be the first entities who are ought to be responsible for cleanup position their wastes. But nonetheless, weak nations suffer the botcher of having to become dumpsites for advanced countries against their will.With the fact that advanced countries depose manipulate rules to recompense their needs, weak countries domiciliate be legally forced to receive industrial wastes from first world countries (Adeola, 2000, pp. 688-689). Powerful nations have seized the privilege of gaining economic benefits, while they have successfully and painstakingly avoided the responsibility for their own wastes (Adeola, 2000, pp. 688-689). Strong countries would ordinarily use their influence over the international economic arena to forcefully use other countries as dumpsites of the waste generated in industrialized nations.And given that most of the countries worldwide have adhered to the tenets of globalization, most of the poor nations voluntarily submitted to the desire that they have to willfully succumb to the calls of more industrialized nations, thus accept the idea to serve as industrial dumpsites. Thus giving weak nations the brunt of bearing the dismal effect for their environment and natural resources, that at most times have not been generated int heir countries. Though there are certain conventions/policies which have been set up to control this alarming unequivo cal dumping of wastes, still, there are blunders that flock be pointed out.In supplement to waste dumping, another issue that should worry the international community is the occupation of recyclable wastes. Although the Basel expression is bound to formulate policies geared towards setting a standard on trading of wastes, more often than not, these policies favor richer nations. In effect, the Basel Convention has not been so successful in regulating waste pots. The definitions that it has set out are vague and often do not coincide with the nations own set of definitions.For example, a unsafe waste according to the Basel Convention may not be considered insecure for a particular country, therefore completely not abiding with it. Thus, these inconsistencies make these definitions and policies unfit for use (Alter, 1994, pp. 109-110). In addition, different countries have opposed the Basel Convention to its use arguing that the possible banning of waste trade can harm their ec onomy. Most of the countries, both the developed and developing nations, that halting the trade will serve grave set up on their economy.First, developed nations could overleap an ample amount of economic profits if they lose the chance of dumping their wastes on poorer countries. And on the other hand, the claim of less developed nations that they can only afford second hand materials to be used in their industries, rather than generating raw materials of their own which are more extravagant to explicate (Alter, 1994, pp. 111-112). Moreover, recent data and statistics are able to show the manner at which waste dumping has been proven to serve distinct harsh effects on the economy, health and well being of the nations that have been brought up to serve as dump sites.This matter has put the issue of social shabbiness in the light. The problem of the distribution of environmental hazards has been lopsidedly pushed towards the weaker nations, whilst leaving richer nations away from the problem that they have created. Given the ill conditions of their consumption patterns their poor economic abilities render the people residing in such area the tendency to sop up less than the population in rich countries they bear the brunt of having to accommodate industrial wastes which have been ironically not produced and consumed within their countries (Anderton, 1994, pp. 29-248).Thus, in such matters, cleaning your own mess does not count. Racism and the logic of whoever stays stronger gain the upper hand (Anderton, 1994, pp. 29-248). Thus, the more powerful a state can be, the easier they can get to bend laws against the will of weaker nations and their inhabitants not mindful of the foul effects it might render them. Much of the contradiction and irony lie in the fact that as much as human beings benefit largely from the blessings that the environment and its natural resources has bestowed upon them, humans are the first to be blamed from the hastening process of its depletion.More than an issue of high consumption in industrialized nations, the powerful leaders of the world have not devised a way towards proper disposal of their wastes. Industrial wastes have been dumped haphazardly, thus contaminate the environment and gravely affect natural resources. environmental injustice is even more highlighted with the fact that the country who generates more wastes, is generally the country who gets away with it by dumping their wastes somewhere else as a form of a recyclable wastes which in any way generate more environment toxins.In the guise of economic prosperity and austerity measures, environment suffers a lot. Rich countries dump industrial toxins as a form of generating more profit for trading their wastes. While developing and poor countries accept these wastes and use scrap materials because they are cheaper, unmindful of the harmful emissions they may release that can endanger their environment. Thus, though high-end consumption in ind ustrialized countries may pose a threat to the environment, irresponsible dumping of the wastes generated through these consumptions serve more dangerous as the former.And if the international community does not make regulations on proper disposal of these wastes, environment is off to suffer gravely than ever.ReferencesAdeola, Francis. January 2000. Cross-National Environmental Injustice and Human Rights Issues. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 43 No. 4. Alter, Harvey. imposing 1994. Controlling International Trade in Wastes. Anderton, Douglas. et al. May 1994. Environmental candor The Demographics of Dumping. Demography. Vol. 31, No. 2.