Intellectual Diversity Essay Example for Free

Intellectual mixed bag EssayHave you ever really stopped to conceptualize about form? The typical idiosyncratic usually thinks of variant skin colors or the different backgrounds every atomic number 53 has. By definition diversity is the match of being different. The term diversity encompasses a broad scope. There are many realms to diversity much(prenominal) as economic, cultural, and gender. However a type of diversity that has been growing in buzzword in modern years, especially among the conservative communities of college campuses, is talented diversity. Intellectual diversity, along with academic freedom is what activists handle David Horowitz characterize as being the equal management of an individual, regardless of political affiliations or religious beliefs. The leftist tendencies inherent in academia are of scat not a refreshed development, though they harbor been better-documented as of new by conservative writers. The issue that these writers discuss i s how intellectual diversity is threatened in these different environments finished disciple politics as swell up as the liberalized environments themselves.The issue of intellectual diversity is a dilemma that the establishment moldiness deal with carefully. They cannot simply issue strict laws regarding the protection of intellectual diversity on campus because this does not satisfy what everyone wants and more importantly what they need. The government, as well as these conservative activists has to realize that at that place will al shipway be a liberal opposition in the world. They must recognize that although it is totally just to action for equal treatment and opportunity for people with different views, it is not ok to vindication these people from the opposing liberal perspectives completely because that limits the individual to not be able to explore the different ideas in the world and learn to embrace the opposition. It will ultimately limit them from being able to buy the farm a well-rounded and educated person.Conservative students are being crushed in liberal campuses and in classrooms where instructors build different views. Case after case of liberal activism and indoctrination has been publicized by conservative activists. This is because activists like David Horowitz have realized the effects of a liberal atmosphere, and biased teachers. In Schools of Reeducation, Frederick M. Hess touches on the topic of a young college student of Washington State, Ed Swan, a conservative Christian father of four that was flunked with the bill that he revealed opinions that have caused me great concern in the areas of race, gender, sexual orientation and privilege.In David Horowitzs In Defense of Intellectual Diversity students from the University of Denver and Duke are described as having to deal with seeing partisan propaganda posted on doors and hallways as well as joking warnings from teachers that say that any Republicans should drop his feed in because of his strong liberal opinions. Because of these and many other displays of liberal dominance in college campuses, conservatives are starting to push a stand, Mr. Horowitz for example wrote the Academic Bill of Rights. The way conservatives are placed in such aggressive environments is not fair, just, or virtuous, it is impartial and nonpartisan.The government must be extremely scrupulous in the ways they deal with intellectual diversity and the laws they implement because it could have negative impacts on the professors and administrators of colleges and universities. In The Right to fall apart the Truth, Ann Marie B. Bahr retells her story of a terrible experience she had undergone when teaching courses on world religions at federation Dakota State University. Students inspired by David Horowitzs Academic Bill of Rights literally induced the poor teacher to fear her job. She felt that they forbade her to express an informed professional opinion. Bahr, a women c ompletely qualified to teach the course was unable to, because if she ever said anything that her students didnt agree with they simply dropped the course. I dont mean David Horowitz would support such behavior arousing from his bill, but this is why the government must be extremely careful, prudent, and precise when dealing with such a delicate issue as intellectual diversity. Where is the justice in scaring teachers to tinge the truth? Or sacrifice their dependable to have and informed professional opinion, there is none.Conservative students must not be shielded from the liberal opposition because it debilitates them from learning how to deal with it it wont go their minds to new ideas and instead will hold them back from becoming the educated, well rounded, less biased individuals that they have the potential to become. The population that Mr. Horowitzs Academic Bill of Rights is directed towards is the unfortunate conservative students who are coif at a disadvantage due t o the hostile environments where liberal propaganda roams free and biased liberal teachers treat them unfairly. But the thing is that these students many times dont break down and crumble at the feet of this liberal monster, but instead grow from the experience. The students come out stronger in the end after handout through such a hard experience.They are able to become strong minded, and intellectually powerful. No college student should ever be put in an unfair situation where they are scared to think and say what they want due to their surrounding environment, or are not able to attain the alike grade as a colleague because of their personal beliefs but they also shouldnt be protected like a mommy with her baby because in the real world there will be those strong minded liberals that you will have to face and converse with, and they need to have already see liberal feedback in their lives in order to be able to respond back effectively. Again the government must be careful n ot to just develop strict laws that protect intellectual diversity. The aim of intensity of these laws must be restricted in order to allow the conservative individual to simmer down grow as a human being.As in many controversial arguments both military positions of intellectual diversity bring up valid points. The side for intellectual diversity argues that we all have the right to have different political, religious, and social views, but regardless of what they are still be treated equally. The side against intellectual diversity argues that if the government enacted strict laws to enforce it, this would lead to negative impacts on professors and administrators of college campuses as well as debilitating students from experiencing real world conflicts and learning from them. The truth is that both sides of the argument are fall off and there is sufficient evidence to prove both points. We the people must not allow one side to emerge from this conflict victorious, because thi s will leave the other side out to suffer the storm. quite we must compromise between the opposing views and find a way to work in project in order to find a termination that benefits both sides equally.There are many realms of diversity provided the one that always seems to be the about controversial, and difficult to solve, is by far intellectual diversity. The fight over whether intellectual diversity should be enforced by the government is not a new one. This is an ongoing conflict that recently has spurred heated debate, now the time has come to solve this problem. It is the single most important responsibility of the government to protect the people, therefore the government not only has the right to create laws on this issue but it is its obligation. However the government must recognize that there are thence two sides, and it must not show sympathy for either one but instead compromise between the two to find a middle ground that will satisfy both sides.The solution th erefore lies in reconciliation. The government must enact a law that protects the intellectual diversity of students however this must be done in a scrupulous manner so it does not have a negative effect on college professors and administrators perhaps even creating a law that protects this population as well if necessary. The government must also limit the intensity of the law students must not be completely shielded from opposing views, for that would be a disservice to the students, whose growth as person would be limited from a strict law. As best put by Harvey Mackey, Nobody said it would be easy, they just promised it would be worth it.