Tuesday, March 26, 2019
Critos Argument Essay -- essays research papers
The purpose of & international angstrom uniterequotCrito&quot seems theorise to exhibit the character of Socrates in one light only, non as the philosopher, fulfilling a divine mission and trusting in the will of Heaven, just now simply as the good citizen, who, having been unjustly condemned is willing to give up his life in obedience to the laws of the State. The main list that seems to entail the word betwixt Crito and Socrates is the eyeshot of the majority on Socrates fate. In the &quotCrito&quot Socrates utters, &quotWhy should we care so much for what the majority think?&quot (Plato 45) Socrates accepts that we should not care what the majority thinks because those who are reasonable great deal will belowstand. However, Critos counter-argument to this is that the majority can cause great persecute therefore we should care what they think. Socrates further goes on to say the majority acts at random therefore, they cannot do great good or great ha rm (Plato 45). Crito says that "the opinion of the many" would judge us wrong if we didnt help you (and anyone in your business office would agree that you ought to send). Socrates notes that some opinion is right and some opinion is wrong. It is not simply a matter of mere opinion, but of correct opinion. The delegacy in this case is the actual truth of the matter. Socrates introduces a distinction between true opinion and false opinion. And the path to the latter is through argument and reason. By appealing to the opinion of "the many," Crito seems to be committing the Ad Populum Fallacy (i.e., something is right, true, etc., because the majority of the population says it is). Socrates seems to pose an open argument the opinion of the many says that escaping from jug is right but is it right? Socrates seems to believe that although the majority believes it is right for him to escape from jail he is going against what he believes to be true. Socrates believes t hat he has a tacit consent with the solid ground by living in capital of Greece for 70 years he has accepted their laws. Furthermore disagrees with avenging and rejects Critos suggestion to flee to Thessaly he will be welcomed there and let loose to speak. Socrates seems to have adhered to the belief that if he was born and raised in this state and had children here he must have agreed with the ways in which the state operates therefore, he cann... ...ur country to intervene and help countries less able. southeastern Vietnam needed the support of the U.S.especially when the North Vietnamese forces threatened them. &9Thus, in conclusion I believe that Socrates was correct to disregard the opinion of the majority. Socrates accepts his fate, for this reason alone he is not a coward. Socrates disagrees with retaliation and has faith in the government of Athens. Although Socrates may not agree with the termination of the assembly to put him to his death, he realizes that he was done wrongly by the assembly rather than the laws of Athens themselves. I believe Socrates feels this way because he has lived under the laws of Athens for 70 years and he has raised his children under the same principles. Socrates accepts the fact that being a member of society demands a certain respect and obedience. Without the rules and punishment system Athens would not be able to function properly. As Socrates decided to become a citizen of the state of Athens he also takes along with him the responsibility of being a citizen of that state. In following the more reasonable people I believe Socrates is merely following the path in which the Gods intended.